News

Reliability index shows traffic jams worsening and commuters allowing extra time for urgent trips.

 

As traffic congestion continues to worsen, the time required for a given trip becomes more unpredictable, and researchers now have a way to measure that degree of unreliability, introduced for the first time as part of the annual Urban Mobility Report (UMR), published by the Texas A&M Transportation Institute (TTI).

 

The planning time index (PTI), a measure of travel reliability, illustrates the amount of extra time needed to arrive on time for higher priority events, such as an airline departure, just-in-time shipments, medical appointments or especially important social commitments. If the PTI for a particular trip is 3.00, a traveler would allow 60 minutes for a trip that typically takes 20 minutes when few cars are on the road. Allowing for a PTI of 3.00 would ensure on-time arrival 19 out of 20 times.

 

PTIs on freeways vary widely across the nation, from 1.31 (about nine extra minutes for a trip that takes 30 minutes in light traffic) in Pensacola, Fla., to 5.72 (almost three hours for that same half-hour trip) in Washington, D.C., according to the study by TTI, a member of the Texas A&M University System.

 

“We all understand that trips take longer in rush hour, but for really important appointments, we have to allow increasingly more time to ensure an on-time arrival,” said Bill Eisele, a TTI researcher and report co-author. “As bad as traffic jams are, it’s even more frustrating that you can’t depend on traffic jams being consistent from day to day. This unreliable travel is costly for commuters and truck drivers moving goods.”

 

Rankings of the nation’s most congested cities vary slightly from year to year, and many of this year’s top 10 are repeat performers. Washington, D.C. tops the list, followed by Los Angeles, San Francisco-Oakland, New York-Newark and Boston. The second five include Houston, Atlanta, Chicago, Philadelphia and Seattle. The report provides a detailed illustration of traffic problems in a total of 498 U.S. urban areas.

 

In addition to PTI, the 2012 UMR also debuts an estimate of the additional carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions attributed to traffic congestion: 56 billion lb—about 380 lb per auto commuter.

 

“Including CO2 emissions into the UMR provides another dimension to the urban congestion problem,” said researcher and co-author David Schrank. “It points to the importance of implementing transportation improvements to reduce congestion.” The analysis of CO2 was made possible by funding from the National Center for Freight and Infrastructure Research and Education (CFIRE).

 

Traffic congestion in U.S. cities has remained relatively stable in recent years and continues to underscore the link between traffic and the economy, according to the UMR. As the nation’s job picture has slowly improved, some congestion measures in 2011 were generally comparable to the year before.

 

Fuel wasted in congested traffic reached a total of 2.9 billion gal—enough to fill the New Orleans Superdome four times. That’s the same as 2010, but short of the 3.2 billion gal wasted in 2005. The travel time index (the difference in time required for a rush hour commute compared with the same trip in uncongested conditions) remained steady at 1.18, still short of the 1.23 level in 2005.

 

The total financial cost of congestion in 2011 was $121 billion, up $1 billion from the year before and translating to $818 per U.S. commuter. Of that total, about $27 billion was wasted time and diesel fuel from trucks moving goods on the system.

 

“The methods and measures developed by TTI and used in the Urban Mobility Report have been successfully implemented for policy making and prioritizing congestion-mitigating projects,” said report co-author and researcher Tim Lomax. “In light of the recent signing of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) Act, there is greater importance on using such measures to prioritize transportation improvement spending to get the highest investment return for the public.”

 

Researchers say that the most effective way to address traffic congestion varies from one urban area to another, but that in all cases, a multifaceted approach should be used, relying on more efficient traffic management and public transportation in addition to new construction. Travel options such as flexible work hours and telecommuting should also be part of the mix.

 

The 2012 installment of the study includes 30 years of trend data with which TTI has measured and analyzed traffic congestion and its impact on life in urban America. The report is the third prepared in partnership with Inrix, a private-sector provider of travel time information for both commuters and shippers.   http://www.roadsbridges.com/congestion-dc-tops-tti-list-most-congested-cities                                                                                                                

 

BridgeGuard® has sponsored the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) Clean Snowmobile Challenge Safety Award for the sixth year. The Clean Snowmobile Challenge has tested and challenged the engineering, innovation and teamwork skills of students from some of the top universities and colleges throughout the United States and Canada.

The SAE International Clean Snowmobile Challenge is an engineering design competition for college and university student members that challenge engineering students to reengineer an existing snowmobile to reduce emissions and noise. Their modified snowmobiles will compete in a variety of events including emissions, noise, fuel economy/endurance, acceleration, handling, static display, cold start and design.

BridgeGuard employees Frank Anderson and Dave Raasakka demonstrate the proper use of a Class A-B-C fire extinguisher to student participants.

 

Student participant using class A-B-C fire extinguisher with Frank Anderson.

In 2013  18 teams from around the U.S. and Canada participated in the event with the University of Idaho, Moscow, ID and their gasoline-powered sled taking the top honors for safety. 

University of Idaho team with BridgeGuard's David Raasakka




 



 

The bridge deck under study, is a single lane overpass with a lane width of 14' and length of 348'. It has a 2" HMA (hot mix asphalt) overlay on top of a waterproof membrane. With assistance from MDOT technicians, six core samples were obtained based on the BridgeGuard scaled report. The location mapping and findings were precise and provided valuable information towards verifying the deck condition and report output.

Below are some photos of this process and some of the delaminations we identified during our testing. Five of the six delaminations  we cored were within the concrete under the 2" asphalt overlay. The 6th delamination was a disbonding of the overlay. When the core bit was removed, the disbonded asphalt (5' to 6' diameter) lifted with the bit.

 

Case study bridge deck being scanned at posted speed to collect the data.

 

Post analysis, BridgeGuard's proprietary software allowed us to locate the delaminations.

 

Delamination #22 with no visible problems in the asphalt.

 

MDOT personnel starting the coring process on delamination #22.

 

Delamination #22 after it has been cored.

 

BridgeGuard Field Technician evaluating a new IR sensor while on site. BridgeGuard strives to utilize the highest quality sensors on the market.

We have recorded the webinar and it is available on our webisite. Please go to the BridgeGuard home page and click on the webinars link. or click HERE. In the right hand column, you will find instructions showing you how to view the webinars.




 

HANCOCK -- There are thousands of bridges that connect drivers from one location to the next in the state of Michigan.

When the Michigan Department of Transportation has to inspect them, it is expensive, it causes traffic delays and it is also a safety risk for the workers but one company is looking to change all of that with the development of new software called BridgeGuard.

“We developed the software for scanning concrete bridge decks for our nation’s infrastructure. What it allows us to do is find delaminations within the deck and we can collect the data, analyze the data, and map it,” said BridgeGuard President Jay Ruohonen.

That information can be sent to the Department of Transportation of each state and the Federal Highway Administration.

As the sun shines down on the surface of a bridge, every delamination has a different thermal temperature and BridgeGuard’s infrared technology is used.

The infrared scanner picks up the damage that is located within the surface of the bridge and transfers that information into the computer.

“Now, what’s unique about the thermal properties or BridgeGuard itself is that we’re able to drive over a bridge at a highway speed of 45 miles an hour,” said Ruohonen.

With this new technology there is an increase in savings especially once it is compared to the traditional methods used today.

BridgeGuard says saving the DOT money is beneficial to the average citizen because it means tax dollars are used efficiently.

After spending three in a half years in development, BridgeGuard is finally launching and hopes that this infrared technology will be a much safer and effective way to inspect bridges.




 

We have started the Asphalt Diurnal Case Study process on a bridge chosen for rehabilitation. A BridgeGuard team was dispatched to scan this bridge every 30 minutes for an entire 24 hour cycle at speed, to gather the necessary data we needed to ground truth our system. The next step will be the milling of the asphalt, then sounded by the DOT, we will scan it again followed by hydro-demolition of the deck.

 

This bridge is 348' long and is 14' wide.

 

Please subscribe on our home page to get direct updates.




 

David Raasakka giving a presentation to MnDOT Personnel in Oakdale Minnesota.

BridgeGuard and MnDOT Personnel discussing BridgeGuard services.

Lead Technician Ben Ruohonen demonstrating equipment.